Request a review
Learn more
Signature pending
Sign
Reject
View details
Review
Not Spam
Remove forever
Not Spam
Page
/
26
Loading…
{"id": "1_yY4t0NzFtdzF0v7g7KhbezajOcKP6X0", "title": "Final order - Working Committee Quo Warranto.pdf", "mimeType": "application\/pdf"}

Page 1 of 26

2024:MHC:3555

W.P.No.12980 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Reserved On : 28.03.2024

Pronounced On : 01.08.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

WP.No.12980 of 2023

and W.M.P.Nos.12762, 12766 and 33967 of 2023

Working Committee of the Residents’ Assembly of Auroville

Represented by its Member Hemant Lamba

Having office temporarily at Koodam,

No.1 Crown Road

Auroville 605 101

Tamil Nadu ... Petitioner

vs

1.Anuradha Legrand

2.Parthasarathy Krishnan

3.Arun Selvam

4.Srimoyi Rossegger

5.Ingeborg Christine Neuman Zimm (Tine)

6.Jose Eusebio Martinez Burdaspar (Joseba)

7.Selvaraj Damodaran

8.Secretary to the Governing Board,

Auroville Foundation,

Auroville Foundation Bhavan,

Auroville 605 101.

1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page 2 of 26

W.P.No.12980 of 2023

... Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

praying to issue a Writ of Quo Warranto removing respondents 1 – 7 from

acting/holding out as members of the Working Committee of the Residents’

Assembly of Auroville under Section 20 of the Auroville Foundation Act, 1988.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.Balasubramanian

Senior Counsel

For Mr.Suchindran.B.N.

For Respondents : Mr.Vaibhav Venkatesh (R8)

No appearance (R1 to R7)

ORDER

The petitioner claims to be the Working Committee of the Residents

Assembly of Auroville, (in short ‘Working Committee) and seeks relief of quo

warranto as against R1 to R7 who also project themselves as constituting the

Working Committee. The submissions of Mr.P.V.Balasubramanian, learned

Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.Suchindran, learned counsel on record for the

petitioner and Mr.Vaibhav Venkatesh, learned counsel appearing for R8 have

been heard in detail. None appears for R1 to R7.

2. Before adverting to the submissions advanced on the main prayer, I

deal with the preliminary objection raised by R8 in regard to the maintainability

of the writ petition in WMP No.33967 of 2023 alleging perjury. According to

2

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

...
F ... f
Open
Open
Open with
Sign In
Details
Comments
General Info
Type
Dimensions
Size
Duration
Location
Modified
Created
Opened by me
Sharing
Description
Loading…
Sign in